[Assam] Forbes - Most powerful women

Ram Sarangapani assamrs at gmail.com
Sat Sep 2 02:03:40 EDT 2006


Dear Bhuban da,

I think the way Forbes ranks them is by the number of citations in the
media, their sphere of influence or $$, and the number of people they affect
by their actions.

Merkel actually had 80% approval in the begining, but now is down to 57% or
something - yet she happens to be the most powerful political woman - as
Germany is the largest economy in Europe.

Rice, by default, even though nominated does have the President's ear. The
US President is the most powerful person in the world.

Gandhi, elected of course, is nevertheless probably controlling the UPA
Govt. behind the scenes, and has tremendous influence on Indian polity.

Nyooi, (I think really deserves it). She has been with Pepsi for a long
time, and in the last 5 years she and the present CEO made most decisions
(mostly hers - like acquisition of Quaker Oats and also Pepsi being the
first to go into the bottle water business) - Coke has just got in.
She will be managing a 100 billion $ company:
(From Forbes: Nooyi has a string of career successes that helped her land
the corner office at the food and beverage giant. She was the lead
negotiator on Pepsi's $13.8 billion purchase of Quaker Oats and worked on
its acquisition of Tropicana, as well as the spin-offs of its restaurant and
bottling businesses. )

Mittal,he of course owns the business, but it was really impressive how he
took over Arcelor.
I was keeping up with that story  - unfortunately, in the end, it all boiled
down to the fact that the Eurpoeans couldn't stand the fact that Arcelor the
pride of Luxembourg (and the French) could be taken over by an Indian.

But, you will agree, Indians are making great inroads in areas they never
had a shot before.

--Ram




On 9/2/06, BBaruah at aol.com <BBaruah at aol.com> wrote:
>
>   Ram
>
>
>
> I think these comparisons are  not very apt. That is not your fault,
> though.
>
>
>
> I put Chancellor Merkel and Sonia Gandhi together: they are both
> democratically elected leaders, now occupying powerful positions as
> politicians, the latter, however,  voluntarily relinquishing a part of
> herself. But not Condi Rice. Though Condi Rice is powerful, she is only a
> nominee of President Bush. She would have to consult White House at every
> toss and turn of world events. I concede that the office of the Secretary of
> State in the USA is unique but then you cannot deny her derived status.
>
>
>
> Indra Nooyi is a CEO of Pepsi and just that, a senior  employee of a
> particular organisation, subject to official discipline and waiting for her
> pension. I suppose she is answerable to a Vice-Chairman of the organisation.
>
>
>
>
> And Mittal owns the organisation; at least in his sphere he is supreme.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
> Bhuban*  *
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/assam_assamnet.org/attachments/20060902/f026e61a/attachment.htm 


More information about the assam mailing list