[Assam] Letter of Reply from ULFA to Shantikam Hazarika

Fri Oct 12 08:21:50 CDT 2007

Respected  assamonliners,

We feel you are not coming forth with questions  - maybe  fearing Parasar,Biswajeet('Rascul '  famed) and such RAW lackies will round you up and disappear you.
Upto you.
Wish to note a few points:
Shati-Kam wrote you all to the right path and the agony of 'dukhuni' Assam, which I love the most, comes to an end.
   which I love the most, Really? even more than we do?That is why we wanted you. Behave like Prince Siddhartha-- come and attain  real Nirvana and liberate your beloved land.

  agony of 'dukhuni' Assam, You are the Brightest Management Guru East of Suez as they say. You also claim Govt . of Assam wanted  YOU to make  real men out of DUKHUNI's children.Now for assamonliners' benefit you need explaining what you have done and plan to do  to make the Dukhuni children come out of her agony. Is Ulfa your hindrance-How?What? 

  right path  This is not modern Management language is it?   Talk of Paradigm,Synergy,Win-Win ,Disappearing National Boundaries,Global Citizens,  Blah-Blah--

  comes to an end. Will end when our 5 Crore people arrive at a point where they can Plan lives-not disasters.

  Keep those Questions coming. We will learn too.
  Yours 
  Rubi

  shantikam hazarika <shntikamhaz at hotmail.com> wrote:
      .hmmessage P  {  margin:0px;  padding:0px  }  body.hmmessage  {  FONT-SIZE: 10pt;  FONT-FAMILY:Tahoma  }       
  Quote:

  For Rubi Bhuyan:

  I am happy to receive a direct mail addressed to me. I shall directly get to the points raised and would not raise any extraneous issues, though I must say the provocation is there.

      Your relevant mail has proven that, your real intention is to destroy the National Liberation Struggle of Asom by attacking Ruby Bhuyan of the ULFA like a rabid dog biting people on the street indiscriminately. We thank you for revealing your design.

  No response called for. 

    We do not wish to insult you by trying to make you knowledgeable how the modern communications have made the world a small place. However, we are at a loss to make out why are you unaware of the aim of the ULFA¢s past Twenty-Eight years of struggle in Asom? Excepting a yokel, a person like you well versed in advanced technology, should not have to come up with such a view.
          I am fully aware of what the proclaimed aim of ULFA is. I am only at a loss as to what to make out of the aim. Also, I am not sure what the real aim of the ULFA is. Thee deeds do not match the aims.

      The debate in question was not put forward in a manner of your requirement of ¡asked them in plain, straight forward English¢. You are trying to throw blows in the air just to sweep this deficiency under the carpet. We would like to remind you that the debate took place as a result of Nayan Parasar criticizing impertinently in the Asom On Line forum ¡the get well wish¢ statement of our Honourable Chairman Arobinda Rajkhowa when Dr. Mamoni Goswami fell ill. Criticism of a ¡Get well wish¢ cannot be ¡Honest,gentle, civilized¢. 

          Unfortunately my knowledge of the English language and perhaps my comprehending capability of the language is deficient. Hence I failed to make any head or tail of what has been stated above. 

          But you approving his subterfuge and attacking the ULFA with vindictive words have been noted in the net.

          By the way, are you trying to scare me or what? Earlier you were going to do a background check on me and now you are "noting" my words. What do you mean?

    You may not be aware that about ten years ago Prof. Jugal Kalita linking the ULFA website to the Assam Org site there was an objection raised by one Supratik Gupta. Following this there was a long debate between Arun Mahanta, a member of the ULFA¢s Central Publicity Group and Supratik Gupta. In this debate, Supratik was given detailed replies with unambiguous views the ULFA holds. Supratik Gupta was not satisfied with it, but, the ULFA was very frank in giving out replies. He wished to know what his status would be in a Sovereign Independent Assam to a person of Bangladesh origin. We must say that Supratik Gupta behaved like a gentleman. On the other hand your good man Nayan Parasar does not sound at all a gentleman, but a sycophant bent upon keeping Asom under colonial occupation forever. We are analysing of the reasons why should you be promoting the sycophancy of Parasar as something very honourable.
          I am not aware of what may have transpired ten years ago and has no relevance here. Nor do I know who Nayan Parasar is. Again, I feel honoured that the stuff that I type out on the net, (frankly I never think twice about them while typing them and after pressing the 'send' button, forget about them) deserve 'analysis'. The importance you seem to be giving to me is rather embarrassing to me. 

              If you really want a useful discussion, you are welcome to come forward in earnest. Do you think only your type are the ones who deserves respect? You do not have to instigate any one to have a debate with us. In this instant what has unfolded puts you in the same defiled platform as with Nayan Parasr and Utpal Borpujari. Otherwise we could have a meaningful dignified debate in the meantime. Instead of scornfulness and insulting, a simple request on the query would have an appropriate approach. Now, in trying to prove the mastery of English or lack of it, has pushed aside our willing to be engaged in a meaningful discussion from the original debate. There is saying, ¡Faith is all about belief and destructive criticism shakes such beliefs¢ and a similar response by yourselves has ruined the possibility of productive engagement in this instance. 

  I am always looking for an opportunity to debate with the ULFA people. In fact that is why when you responded, even though obliquely, I welcomed the chance. I do not want your respect, because then I shall lose the respect of many people, which I cannot afford. So please continue with your scorn, it does not bother me. I do not know who Nayan Parasar is, but Utpal Borpujari is a person about whom I am very proud of. He is an Assamese who commands very deep respect in the appropriate circles. And I shall be, anyday, proud to share any platform with him, if I can make myself worthy of the same. If you want to have your way, you shall HAVE to convince people like us and engage in meaningful discussion. However, your response gives me the feeling that you have been groping for ways to wriggle out of any debate with me.

              Why are you all trying to damage the Mahanta brothers now?

          What we do to them should be none of your business, unless......

      So Rubi Bhuyan, what did you try to imply by addressing a mail to me,  which did not make much sense to me except some veiled intimidations. I am still willing to take up issues with you, why don't you talk straight and to the point?

      With all my regards. May God one day bring you all to the right path and the agony of 'dukhuni' Assam, which I love the most, comes to an end.

      Shantikam Hazarika

    Shantikam Hazarika
  Director, 
  Assam Institute of Management
  PO Box 30, GUWAHATI 781001, India
  HOME PAGE: www.aimguwahati.edu.in 

---------------------------------
  Check out some new online services at Windows Live Ideas—so new they haven’t even been officially released yet. Try it! _______________________________________________
assam mailing list
assam at assamnet.org
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org

---------------------------------
 For ideas on reducing your carbon footprint visit Yahoo! For Good this month.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://assamnet.org/pipermail/assam_assamnet.org/attachments/20071012/39d1a287/attachment.html 