[Assam] [WaterWatch] How Tata & Ambani Corrupted Indian Judiciary

Mon Oct 22 22:26:10 CDT 2007

How Tata & Ambani Corrupted Indian Judiciary? 
Are Consumers Terrorists? 
Corrupted Only  by Tata and Ambani? 
Only Judiciary and Lawyers Corrupted?

Who allowed Electric Supply Cos to cheat all consumers except Govt  MLA/ MP's
Discuss/Define/Justify  every entry into an Electric Bill:

Connected Load Minimum  Fixed Charge--?
Capacitor Surcharge?
Maximum Demand  surcharge
BSI approved Meter
You can trace back every Cheating to the book of Words.
Scrap it!
mm

To: WaterWatch at yahoogroups.comFrom: rohit.pathania at gmail.comDate: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 20:58:08 +0530Subject: Re: [WaterWatch] How Tata & Ambani Corrupted Indian Judiciary

Interesting observation. One must also point out that in spite of repeated warnings not to disconnect power to reduce losses due to theft, a move that inconvenienced a much larger number of people than they target at, they have been continuing to do so. 
On 10/22/07, Ravinder Singh <povertyfree77 at yahoo.com> wrote: 

How Tata & Ambani Corrupted Indian Judiciary? 
Are Consumers Terrorists?  

I started investigation in to the BRPL/BYPL/NDPL loot in Delhi "With Magnifying Glass" after news appeared wherein Supreme Court has asked NCDRC " Are electricity users consumers" which is clipped here. 

http://www.ficci.com/media-room/speeches-presentations/2007/july/rakeshmehta.pdf 
http://www.ficci.com/media-room/speeches-presentations/2007/july/ajaydhagat.pdf 

The first document was the presentation of Rakesh Mehta former MCD chief who turned a blind eye to unauthorized Commercial Complexes coming up on main roads and even highways in grossest violations of building byelaws. But what I found was even more stunning. 

BRPL/BYPL/NDPL so thoroughly corrupted our Bureaucrats, Technocrats, Legislature and entire judiciary as if judges of the Supreme Court are mere toys. 

It will shock our founding father who liberated India after centuries of slavery that in few decades just two Ambani and Tata could enslave us 1.15 billion Indians. 

Over Rs.10,000 Per Consumer On Metering 

Infrastructure Investment 2002-2007 In Rs. Crores

Item/ Years

BYPL

BRPL

NDPL

G. Total

"B" Items

733

1354

870

2957

Total

1158

1822

1314

4294

BRPL/BYPL/NDPL has 2.6 million consumers but in the name of Infrastructure development these Discoms invested over 70% of public money on "Accessories" of power system like you have music system or leather seat covers etc that contributes little to car performance. 

Under category "B" items like METERS, SCADA, HVDC, GIS and IT, I don't find much capital investment in these except Meters. 

Even after extorting Rs.10,000 per consumer under "B" these crooks believe our Politicians, Judges and Bureaucrats are all idiots who help them to institute false and fabricated cases when actually 25 brand new and accurate meters could be provided to each consumer with the king of money fraudulently wasted on public account. 

With the kind of money I would have provided "Flawless Power System". 

But difference in case wasteful expenditure is that consumers shall be billed for it in tariff for lifetime. 

Over Rs.10,000 per consumer was wasted on basically unproductive investment when they actually test checked all consumer meters in first two months itself. 

Even more starling is the fact that politicians like Madan Lal Khurana and Sheila Dixit promoted corruption and unauthorized and illegal colonies. 

On page 5 you will find the T&D losses shot up from 20% to 50% within two years from 1992-95 when Madan Lal Khurana became first chief minister of Delhi winning on promise of regularizing illegal colonies, industries, shops and providing water and electricity. 

Are Consumers Terrorists?  

In the second document you will find that GOI has provided CISF force to professional thugs Ambanis and Tatas. 

Apart from raids 20-100 per day when well armed police assist raiding parties of discoms FABRICATED bills are raised more than the purchase price of the residential properties when no case is made out in case of legal consumers. 

Discoms don't consider load factor in assessing load that is only 11% and then multiply it with six months at five times normal tariff that eventually case 400 Times Inflated DAE billing where none exists. 6X5X9X1.5 = 405 – nine times load and 1.5 tariff charged at highest tariff slab. 

With the kind of money – Rs 3000 crores it would be possible to read and check meters every day. Meter readers are paid only 0.40p or just one cent per reading. 

For 2.6 million consumers daily meter reading cost shall be Rs.10.4million or Rs.370 crores annually- interest on Rs.3000 crores plus cost of Terrorist Raids would definitely be more. 

Bunch of extreme idiots make a fool of our entire system. 

75,000 Raids But Only 119 Cases Finalized In Five Years. 

Over 75,000 raids were conducted but only 5830 cases of them were referred to Special Courts out of that only 119 were finally concluded. 

Entire judicial system may have to be engaged to deal with bogus cases. 

Ravinder Singh October22, 2007
Progressingindia07 at yahoo.com 

Are electricity users consumers, asks SC 

TIMES NEWS NETWORK October20, 2007 Delhi P-10 

New Delhi: Electricity users probably constitute one of the largest chunks of all consumers but the Supreme Court found that the law was not clear whether they could move a consumer forum for speedy redressal of disputes with power distributors. 
   Looking at the large number of complaints against power distributors by electricity users, it asked the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) to decide whether consumers of electricity could be classified as 'consumers' under the Consumer Protection Act (CPA).    
What came in the way of the apex court accepting electricity users as consumers was the provisions of Electricity Act, 2003, which bars jurisdiction of civil courts from entertaining any disputes relating to power supply to consumers, terming them as technical matters. 
   Setting aside an NCDRC verdict which gave relief to a resident of Jharkhand by treating him as a consumer of electricity without examining the effect of the 2003 law, a Bench comprising Justices Arijit Pasayat and P Sathasivam asked NCDRC to examine afresh whether a consumer of electricity was a consumer under the CPA. 
   The dilemma before the court was that while section 2(o) of the CPA defined service to include any service with regard to banking, financing, insurance, transport, processing, supply of electrical energy and entertainment, the provisions of Electricity Act, 2003, barred jurisdiction of civil courts in matters relating to unauthorised use of electricity, tampering of meters and distribution and calibration of meters, these being technical in character. 
   It said, "In view of the fact that the National Commission has not addressed the question whether consumers of electricity are covered by the definition of 'consumer' as defined in Section 2(o) of the Consumer Protection Act, we set aside the NCDRC order and remit the matter to the National Commission for a positive finding on the aspect." 

__________________________________________________Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com 

__._,_.___ 
Messages in this topic (0) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic 
Messages | Files | Photos | Links | Database | Polls | Calendar 

 Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe 

Recent Activity

 13
New Members

 1
New FilesVisit Your Group 

Yahoo! Finance
It's Now Personal
Guides, news,
advice & more.

Y! Messenger
Files to share?
Send up to 1GB of
files in an IM.

Best of Y! Groups
Discover groups
that are the best
of their class.
. __,_._,___ 

_________________________________________________________________
Call friends with PC-to-PC calling -- FREE
http://get.live.com/messenger/overview
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://assamnet.org/pipermail/assam_assamnet.org/attachments/20071023/c0b8719d/attachment.html 