[Assam] An open letter to the Prime Minister

[uttam borthakur]

Dear Chandan Da,
No. I do not think any one has to respond to any innuendos or charges here. And we cannot sit on any kind of judgment at all on the basis of any charges leveled here.
In this particular factual matrix, I have explained my cause of worry: whether I should continue the conversation at all? Because, I was a bit perturbed whether the utterances that I considered outrageous were coming from a person well in control. 
And my attitude in this matter is evident from direct talks with the person concerned than relying on any other netter's comments ( the reference was pure incidental and never material for me). My last comment should clear the clouds, if any: "In the meanwhile, we may engage in discussions about events with dignity. I hope you understand.".  






XXXXXXXXXXXXXI have only one question here Uttam:

Just because Bikash Das or anybody else throws some innuendo or charge against somebody else, does it mean that the target of such charges, innuendos,
must explain them ?

If  netter A demands to from netter B when he stopped beating his wife, is netter B REQUIRED to answer the question to clear his name? Is there even a semblance of justice in such accusations or innuendos. 

And when Netter B refutes such an accusation, are you or I equipped to sit in judgement of that ? Would you even wish to? To be specific, what do you know of Bikash Das or what do I know, to give his charges or innuendos any credence? 

Think about it.

c-da


Uttam Kumar Borthakur